homepage
previous -- view my teaching portfolio here
|
|
Electronic
Teaching Portfolio
|
|
1. Did the lectures contribute to your learning in the course? | 3.57 | ||
4.29 |
|||
2. Is the instructor well-prepared for class? | |||
3. Appeared knowledgeable about course material? | 4.71 | ||
4. Clarified material covered in the course? | 4 | ||
3.86 |
|||
5. Showed interest in helping students understand the material? | |||
4.71 |
|||
6. Returned assignments within a reasonable amount of time? | |||
7. Concerned about students' progress in the course? | 3.79 |
||
8. Provided helpful answers to students' questions? | 3.64 | ||
9. Treated students with respect? | 4.14 | ||
10. Provided constructive feedback on assignments? | 4 | ||
11. Maintained an environment in which students felt comfortable asking questions? | 4.29 |
||
12. How was the pace of the course? (3=About right, lower means faster) | 2.86 | ||
13. Did you have difficulty understanding the instructor's spoken English? | 1 |
||
14. Did the instructor have difficulty understanding questions that were asked? | 1.4 | ||
15. Would you recommend this instructor to other students taking this course? | 4.14 | ||
Key: 1=Not at all/Hardly at
all/Much too fast
|
|||
Comments: This was the first time I'd taught this particular course, in pre-algebra/arithmetic. I felt pretty confident about it most of the time, but I feel certain that the next time I teach this the evaluations will improve somewhat. I found the format of teaching four hours straight difficult (the lectures were just once a week on Sunday afternoons). It tends to encourage me to rush through the material, and I need to work a little harder at slowing down, and taking more time to do review, as I would in classes that were broken up over several classes during the week. Course page is available here. |
|||
(c) 2004 by Betsy McCall, all
rights reserved To contact the webmistress, email betsy@pewtergallery.com last updated: 2004 September 25 |